Skip to Main Content

ABSN Program Guide

Research Help Quick Links


Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Model


"The Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals Model is a powerful problem-solving approach to clinical decision-making, and is accompanied by user-friendly tools to guide individual or group use. It is designed specifically to meet the needs of the practicing nurse and uses a three-step process called PET: practice question, evidence, and translation. The goal of the model is to ensure that the latest research findings and best practices are quickly and appropriately incorporated into patient care."

Reference: The Johns Hopkins Nursing Center for Evidence-Based Practice: Models and Tools.

Practice Question (PICO Development)


There are generally four components of a good practice question and they are represented by the PICO mnemonic.

P=Patient, Population or Problem of interest

I=Intervention - therapy, prognostic factor or exposure

C=Comparison intervention (if relevant)

O=Outcome(s)

Evidence Search Strategies


Strategy

Function

Keyword Searching

Similar to "Google-like" searching where the database will retrieve results based on the terms you enter

Does not take into consideration the context of those terms

Typically retrieves several results, although many may not be relevant to the topic

Keyword searching is very flexible and is a good way to begin a search, especially if you are unsure of the correct terminology to use.  As you begin reading through your results, you may notice trends and patterns in terminology that you can then apply and adapt to your search strategy.   

 

Subject Heading Searching

A targeted, specific way to search using a database's built-in controlled vocabulary 

Various databases have their own subject headings - i.e. CINAHL Headings in CINAHL and the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in MEDLINE/PubMed.  

Controlled vocabulary subject headings function like a thesaurus and will take into consideration synonyms, abbreviations, and variations in spelling

Typically retrieves fewer results than keyword searching, yet results are oftentimes more relevant  

Boolean Operators

Boolean operators provide a logical way to combine keyword or subject heading terms using AND, OR, or NOT

"AND" will narrow your search by combining one of more terms together

"OR" will broaden your search by retrieving results on any of the terms you enter 

"NOT" will exclude designated terms from your results 

Phrase Searching

Use of quotes will tell the database to retrieve results with that exact phrase

"Algase Wandering Scale" 

Nesting

Use of parentheses will group desired search terms together in combination with appropriate Boolean operators

(dementia OR "Alzheimer's disease") AND ("fall prevention" OR "fall risk assessment") 

Truncation

Use of an asterisk * searches for the root of a word

nurs* will find nurse, nurses, nursing

Evidence Appraisal


Parts of a Research Article

Abstract
A brief overview of what the article is about and why the authors did the experiment.

Introduction
Gives you the motivation and importance of the study, includes background information.

Methods
How the experiment was carried out. You need to see the general method and processes used.

Results
This is the raw data from the experiment. There will be charts and tables. Understanding the charts and tables is very important for understanding the paper.

Discussion
Also called analysis  or  conclusions - learn the reasons for the conclusions. This is where you test if you agree with the logic of the conclusions. Using this and the abstract you can determine if the article is relevant to your research.

Questions to Ask as You Read

  1. What questions do I hope this article will answer?

  2. What do the authors conclude?

  3. Why did the authors do this study?

  4. What data/results emerged from the study?

  5. How did the authors do this study?

  6. What is the significance of these findings?

  7. How does this article relate to other articles I've read?

  8. Did this article answer my questions?

  9. Are there other articles cited that I should read?

Hierarchy of Evidence